Twenty thousand households in England are being contacted to take part in a study to track coronavirus in the general population.
The study aims to improve understanding of infection levels and how many people may have immunity to the virus.
Volunteers will provide nose and throat swabs on a regular basis to see whether they have the virus.
The findings will help to inform the government’s strategy for easing the lockdown.
Meanwhile, the government’s scientific advisers will present their findings to ministers later on whether the public should wear face masks.
No decision has yet been made, but the expectation is that the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) will recommend that the public should not wear medical face masks, Newsnight’s Nicholas Watt says.
But the scientists may well say that people should be free to wear their own masks or a scarf across their face as they do provide some benefit, he added.
Downing Street has said the cabinet – which met virtually this morning – was told that Sage had submitted its view to ministers for them to consider, but did not discuss the advice itself.
The PM’s official spokesman said ministers will now review it “to decide on any further action that might be needed”.
Prof Martin Marshall, chairman of the Royal College of GPs, said advising the public to wear masks as a voluntary activity rather than a mandatory one “makes sense”.
He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “In most cases there’s no researched evidence to support wearing a mask if you’re basically fit and well,” he said, adding that it can lead to a “higher risk” of infection if people touch the mask and their eyes.
“However… if someone is coughing and spluttering then it makes complete sense to wear masks in order to protect other people.”
The tracking study being announced by the Department of Health is the largest to date of the population in England, with 20,000 households being approached by the Office for National Statistics to take part in the pilot phase.
Tests will initially be undertaken once a week for five weeks and then every month for 12 months.
Both those with symptoms of the virus and without will be tested – with participants drawn from a representative sample of the UK population by age and geography.
Blood samples (antibody tests) will also be taken from adults in 1,000 households to ascertain whether they have had the virus in the past and have developed some form of immunity. Monthly samples will continue to be taken for a year.
One of the great unknowns when it comes to coronavirus is just how many people are infected but do not show symptoms.
There is some evidence that as many as half of infections are asymptomatic.
Knowing the extent of this will be crucial in managing the gradual moves out of lockdown and relaxing restrictions.
This study will provide help with that – and more. With the initial results expected early in May it will also provide some clue to the extent of transmission in the community overall.
The lack of testing means officials are only able to estimate the spread of the virus from the numbers coming into hospital.
As we move forward, it will also enable the government to respond quickly to any speeding up of transmission.
Meanwhile, the antibody element to the work – when a reliable test is available – will also add to all of this.
But surveillance is just one prong in the armoury the government needs to get the UK back to normal life and keep the virus at bay.
A more difficult element to achieve is a widespread and efficient testing regime. This is essential to allow any outbreak in any part of the population to be contained. We still do not have that in place.
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said the research would answer “crucial questions” as policy makers, clinicians and scientists “continue to build up our understanding of this new virus”.
These include improving understanding of the proportion of people who have had the virus without showing symptoms and how long any immunity to the disease lasts.
The answers will refine computer modelling used by scientists to test the impact of easing various lockdown measures before trying them out.
The first results should be available next month.
Antibody testing – those that show if someone has had the virus in the past – is considered crucial in providing an exit pathway from the current lockdown, as well as providing data to those developing a vaccine.
But England’s chief medical officer, Prof Chris Whitty, told Wednesday’s daily Downing Street briefing that there is currently not a test available that Public Health England has enough confidence in.
Scientists at Oxford University are in the process of validating an antibody test, also known as an Elisa test, which will be used in this study.
They are on track to have a “fully validated and an accreditation compliant test” in place by 4 May, according to Prof Derrick Crook, who is among those co-ordinating the programme of work at Oxford University.
Earlier this month, the government admitted that none of the 3.5 million test kits it had bought from China at a cost of £20m was usable but insisted it was continuing to work with other potential suppliers.
Introducing an antibody blood test and surveillance to determine the rate of infection among the public is one of “five pillars” of the government’s testing strategy, designed to suppress the virus and prevent a resurgence of infections later this year.
The government has pledged 100,000 tests a day by the end of April. Thursday’s figures showed 23,560 tests were carried out.
‘Not going to be eradicated’
The study comes after Prof Whitty warned the UK would have to live with some “disruptive” social distancing measures for at least the rest of the year.
In the “long run” the ideal way out of lockdown would be via a “highly effective vaccine” or drugs to treat the disease, he said.
It is hoped human trials of a potential vaccine for Covid-19 will begin later on Thursday.
Mother-of-two Lydia Guthrie, who has volunteered for the Oxford University project, said she believed taking part is “the right thing to do”.
She told BBC Breakfast: “This pandemic is causing lots of people to step up… in ways that they might not have done before, and this feels like I can take a small, well-managed risk” to help the team find a vaccine.
Figures released by the Department for Health and Social Care on Thursday showed a further 638 people have died with the virus in UK hospitals, bringing the total number of deaths to 18,738.
Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab, who is deputising for the prime minister, told reporters at Wednesday’s coronavirus briefing there was “light at the end of the tunnel” after it was confirmed the UK had reached the peak of infections.
In other developments:
- England’s deputy chief medical officer has said she believes she has had coronavirus, calling it a “very unpleasant experience” which led her to take 10 days off work
- The British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (BAPIO) has written to the heads of NHS bodies in the UK calling for staff to be risk assessed over wider concerns over the disproportionately high number of black and minority ethnic healthcare worker deaths due to Covid-19
- Current statistics on deaths in care homes are likely to be an “underestimate”, Prof Whitty says
- All of Germany’s states have announced plans to make face masks compulsory to combat the spread of coronavirus
- Prince Louis has been photographed making a colourful rainbow poster – a symbol of hope during the coronavirus lockdown – to mark his second birthday
How have you been affected by the coronavirus? Share your experiences by emailing.
Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also contact us in the following ways: